Top of PageNextDesinformation als Methode. Die Baha'ismus-Monographie des F. Ficicchia
Authors: U. Schaefer, N. Towfigh, and U. Gollmer
Publisher: Georg Olms, Hildesheim, Zürich & New York, 1995, 685 pages
Reviewer: Christian Cannuyer (Translated from the original French by Greg Massiah(1)

When, in 1987, I put my name to a work in the "Sons of Abraham" collection, an overview of "The Bahá'ís, People of the Triple Unity," I expressed in the bibliography(2) certain reservations about a work which had appeared six years earlier, and which I found excessively polemical, namely Francesco Ficicchia's Der Baha'ismus - Religion der Zukunft? Geschichte, Lehre und Organisation in kritischer Anfrage (Baha'ism - religion of the future? A critical inquiry into its history, teachings and organisation), published by the Evangelische Zentralstelle für Weltanschauungsfragen (Protestant centre for philosophical questions, Stuttgart). In answer to this work, which has at times been put forward as the "standard work" on the subject in the German language, three Bahá'ís have undertaken to produce a rebuttal. This work has necessitated research of an impressive breadth and quality. The authors are all academics, among the finest representatives of current Bahá'í scholarship, which possesses remarkable dynamism, both in the Germanic and in the Anglo-Saxon world: the musicologist and jurist Udo Schaefer, the orientalist and Islamicist Nicola Towfigh, and the sociologist Ulrich Gollmer. In principle, the Bahá'í Faith enjoins its followers to avoid polemic and aggressive apologetics. Yet, taking Ficicchia's book to be an exercise in systematic disinformation, the authors have chosen to put aside this reticence. U. Schaefer reminds us of the Latin legal saying which warns that Qui tacet, consentire videtur.

This extensive rebuttal is divided into three major parts. The first attacks Ficicchia's method, not without recourse to an ad hominem argument which is not to be taken lightly: in the seventies, Ficicchia was a member of the Bahá'í community of Switzerland and even worked for a time at the world centre of the faith in Haifa. From 1974, however, he entered into open conflict with the Bahá'í community and its supreme authorities. The clear acrimony which shows through on every page of his argument - and whose bitterness I had identified from the outset as excessive - can probably be explained in large part by his inability to conceal his resentment. There is a more serious charge: the authors claim that Ficicchia lacks the necessary knowledge of the oriental languages (chiefly Arabic and Persian) in which the principal sources of the history and doctrine of the early Bahá'í Faith were written. Moreover, they point out indisputable faults in his use of secondary literature in German and English. Supported by numerous precise and verifiable examples (a few soundings of my own sufficed to assess their relevance), their attacks are remarkably effective. Though they are relentless, intellectual integrity compels me to acknowledge that their target is deserving. One senses too the apologists' concern with denying Ficicchia the right to treat the Bahá'í Faith as a marginal and questionable sect. The Bahá'í Faith today is a universal religion in its own right, with some five million followers, whose status is recognised by the United Nations, who have invited its participation in several of its commissions as a Non-Governmental Organisation. For the Bahá'ís this recognition is vital: on the pretext that their faith is merely a dissident sectarian movement within Islam, they are persecuted by the Islamic Republic of Iran as well as by the governments of a number of other Muslim countries. In Iran, the faith's country of origin, the Bahá'ís, numbering around 300,000, are considered mahdur ad-damm, "people whose blood may be shed with impunity," and not as "People of the Book" deserving respect and tolerance. Hundreds of their number have been executed or murdered since the fall of the Shah, while hundreds more languish in jail in Tehran and elsewhere.

The second part aims to point out and to rectify those erroneous representations of Bahá'í theology,(3) law, and ethics of which Ficicchia is guilty. Two points of particular importance are the legitimacy of the present Universal House of Justice, the supreme organ of the Faith since 1963, and the authenticity of the Kitáb-i-Aqdas ("Most Holy Book"), one of the pillars of the new revelation whose status as "Holy Writings" entails, from the Bahá'í viewpoint, specific differences which prevent it from being considered the equivalent of a Bible or a Qur'an; under these circumstances, the text is inseparable from the entire teachings of Bahá'u'lláh and of his heirs, 'Abdu'l-Bahá and Shoghi Effendi. We are nevertheless pleased to note that the Kitáb-i-Aqdas has finally been published in its entirety, an official English translation in 1992 and a French one in 1996. One of Ficicchia's misinterpretations of Bahá'í practice which the authors latch on to is his assertion that Bahá'ís are required to recite a ritual prayer (salát) three times a day, a custom inspired by the Muslim's fivefold daily prayer. True, the Kitab-i-Aqdas (K6) ordains three individual ritual prayers a day. However, Bahá'u'lláh, the founder of the faith, subsequently modified this prescription leaving Bahá'ís a choice of three versions of the ritual prayer: the shortest and the longest should only be recited once a day, and only the "medium" prayer requires three recitations (morning, noon and evening).

The final part of the rebuttal concerns "darker" passages of Bahá'í history, notably the schisms which have shaken the community since its inception. It is regarding these issues that my own work generated a "response" - a most courteous one - in 1990, from an eminent member of the Belgian Bahá'í community, my friend Louis Hénuzet.(4) Though I cannot here go into the finer detail of these complicated incidents and their manifold reverberations, I remain convinced that Bahá'ís have a tendency to play down the seriousness of the dissensions which have split their community since its foundation. In these matters - quite understandably - their faith leads them to remove any blame from their three successive supreme guides, the prophet and manifestation of God Bahá'u'lláh (1817-92), his son 'Abdu'l-Bahá (1844-1921) and the latter's grandson, the Guardian Shoghi Effendi (1896-1957), who, during his "reign" succeeded in falling out with almost his entire family. I must admit that I cannot help observing that these individuals - otherwise engaging characters and essentially unselfish - led the community with an ever-increasing authoritarianism, which accounts for many of the tensions which arose at its heart. Ficicchia may well have blackened Bahá'u'lláh out of all proportion in favour of his brother; he may also be wrong - following the American Bahá'í Ruth White - in his outright denial of the authenticity of 'Abdu'l-Bahá's Will and Testament which appoints Shoghi Effendi as Guardian of the Cause and lays the foundations for the future Bahá'í institutions: this takes nothing away from the fact that the authors' (and Monsieur Hénuzet's) counter-argument appears to paint an idealised portrait of the founders of Baha'ism which does not stand up to scrutiny.(5) Yet here we are touching upon the sensitive boundaries between faith and historical analysis: it is hard for a believer to turn his/her critical gaze upon the person of the prophet, the instrument of revelation, and, in the Bahá'ís' view, the manifestation for our age of the one Divine Light. Bahá'ís may perhaps come to realise that, like any revelation, the message of their faith, which is so pure, so modern, and so inspiring - the oneness of God, the oneness of revelation, and the oneness of mankind - has been transmitted through human beings and cannot bypass their weaknesses. For my own part, I tried to show in my work that these - usually quite excusable - failings do not blemish the greatness and the profound spirituality of the new Abrahamic religion heralded by Bahá'u'lláh.

Overall, this book impressed me by the rigour of its argument and the relevance of its findings. As it reviews the majority of those aspects of the Bahá'í faith attacked by Ficicchia, it also constitutes a masterly survey of the doctrinal and vital principles of this religion. By consulting this book, especially with the aid of its copious "Sachindex" (index by subject) (667-685), one may obtain a mine of information on Bahá'í theology, practice, and ethics, and the Bahá'í vision of the socio-political organisation of the human family. Ficicchia's book was an attempt to reduce the Bahá'í community to a "sect" with doubtful motives, engaged in unwholesome activities. This is a serious accusation in this age, when the phenomenon of sects is a cause of genuine disquiet. For my part, I would not change one word of what I wrote in 1987: "Emerging from Shi'ih Islam, considered by the ayatollahs in present-day Iran as a harmful heresy, relegated by others to the rank of a sect, Baha'ism today is in reality a religion of universal import which has left the orbit of Islam. It is a separate 'Abrahamic monotheism' in its own right: for its original teachings it merits attention. For its message of love, its tolerance and humanitarian activity, it inspires sympathy. For its many martyrs, in Iran and elsewhere, it is due respect." It is this respect which is claimed by Schaefer, Towfigh, and Gollmer's book. The claim is honourable and the pleading hits the mark.


PreviousNextA Basic Bahá'í Chronology
Authors: Glenn Cameron with Wendi Momen
Publisher: Oxford, George Ronald, 1996, 540 pages
Historical Dictionary of the Bahá'í Faith (Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements, no. 17)
Authors: Hugh C. Adamson and Philip Hainsworth
Publisher: Lanham, Md; London, Scarecrow Press, 1998, 504 pages
Reviewer: William P. Collins

With the Bahá'í Faith's dramatic growth and relative emergence from obscurity in the past two decades, the need for adequate reference books becomes ever more acute. Articles in general encyclopædias have tended to perpetuate common errors of fact and have often misstated what Bahá'ís believe. Treatment in reference works on religion in general, or on Islam in particular, have often either marginalised the Bahá'í Faith or treated only its recognisably Islamic traits. Notable exceptions are The Encyclopædia of Religion, edited by Mircea Eliade (New York: Macmillan, 1987), the second edition of The Encyclopaedia of Islam, and Encyclopaedia Iranica. However, the preparation of accurate, moderate, well-organised dictionaries and encyclopædias specifically on the Bahá'í Faith becomes more essential as researchers go to libraries to determine what this religious community is really all about.

A project to prepare a Bahá'í encyclopædia has been under way for some time. Questions of focus, tone, timing, and format have meant that this project has moved slowly, with the Universal House of Justice preferring that it be done right rather than that it be done quickly. The gap left by the absence of a truly comprehensive, authoritative, and balanced encyclopædia is being filled by Bahá'ís who have prepared a handful of one-volume reference works. Among the most widely used is Wendi Momen's A Basic Bahá'í Dictionary (Oxford: George Ronald, 1989), 261 pages in length, with short, clear definitions of main Bahá'í ideas, biographies of major figures, descriptions of holy places and events, and enough useful illustrations to give visual impact to the main points.

A successor volume, Glenn Cameron's A Basic Bahá'í Chronology, twice the length of the dictionary, provides a reasonably detailed timeline of Bahá'í history, with illustrations. Chronologies are not normally something that comes off the shelf often, but when needed for verifying dates they are indispensable. In the preface, the authors clearly indicate that there is no way to include every date, but that inclusion was based upon a date either having significant importance to how the Bahá'í Faith of today emerged, or being a date for some "fascinating" occurrence. While it would be impossible for such a work to be exhaustive, at well over 500 pages, a significantly full timeline is available. This chronology has proved useful on several occasions for finding the publication from which a particular date has been taken - useful information for researchers who need to verify the provenance of chronological information and make determinations of the veracity of that information. The chronology entries are keyed to the original source (book or periodical) from which they are taken. So while the author himself makes no claim to absolute accuracy in verifying dates, a researcher can be certain of the source from which the date was taken. The page layout is one that facilitates the location of specific years, months, and days: the year is clearly indicated as a running header on each page, with months and days set in bold in a column on the left. The many black and white photographs are strategically placed to relate to a chronological entry on the same or a facing page. Cameron's chronology also includes a good index that refers the reader to the specific dates where entries relate to the index topic. A useful improvement to this kind of volume would be chronological maps showing growth in distribution and size of the Bahá'í community. That, however, would be solved if George Ronald publisher were to prepare a third volume - A Basic Bahá'í Atlas - in which the history, growth, spread, and distribution of the Bahá'í Faith could be illustrated cartographically, with short scholarly articles on each aspect covered.

The latest addition to reference books on Bahá'í subjects, long awaited by Bahá'í bibliophiles, is Adamson and Hainsworth's Historical Dictionary of the Bahá'í Faith. This is volume 17 in a Scarecrow Press series - Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies and Movements. This series is edited by Jon Woronoff, who edits a number of other series of historical dictionaries for Scarecrow. According to the publisher, the series was conceived as a way to present essential information concisely, in a format that lends itself to ready reference, in language accessible to the layperson. Each volume deals with a specific religion, philosophy, or movement (e.g. Buddhism, Mormonism, Terrorism, the Olympic movement, Catholicism, organised labour, Hinduism, environmentalism, etc.), and has entries on significant persons, places, events, institutions, groupings, practices, writings, doctrines, trends, issues, etc. Each dictionary volume follows a more-or-less standard format that attempts to provide helpful content. An introduction provides an overview and historical context. A chronology provides a quick and easy checklist for important dates. There is also a list of acronyms and sometimes maps if geography is important to a religion. Several volumes have photographs when authors thought it important to portray famous people or places. The dictionaries themselves are intended to give relatively brief entries, although authors have leeway to make decisions about how much information should be included on each topic. The volumes in this series are less uniform than those in Scarecrow's country series, as many concepts require lengthy explanations. There are cross references. The bibliography section should be extensive but carefully selected, organised by subject, and should include more specialised sources. Depending on the topic (and author), a number of the sources may be in languages other than English. The intent is to include as many sources as possible that will be available to North American audiences, but since the publisher sells books worldwide, sources important to the higher-level researcher may be included as well. The editor, according to Scarecrow Press, reads extensively in the field before seeking an author for any given volume. The authors are therefore mostly subject specialists, well-known in their particular field.

In the case of the Historical Dictionary of the Bahá'í Faith, the authors are Bahá'ís in the United Kingdom who have produced several publications, particularly Philip Hainsworth who has written a number of introductory booklets, journal articles, and book chapters. The authors have followed Scarecrow Press's general formula for the series. In addition to a preface and introduction, the authors have included a description of the epochs of the formative age, chronologies ("timelines"), appendices of genealogical information for central figures, lists of important groups of individuals (e.g. Hands of the Cause of God), a description of the Bahá'í calendar, and statistics. The lengthy bibliography focuses about half on authoritative texts, with other primary and secondary literature comprising the remaining half. The bibliography seems to reference primarily articles and books published under Bahá'í auspices, and gives no reference to such major Bahá'í periodicals as The Bahá'í Studies Review, The Journal of Bahá'í Studies, and World Order.

The actual dictionary itself occupies some 360 pages of the book. It is important to recognise that preparation of a historical dictionary of the Bahá'í Faith, in the absence of any earlier examples to build upon, is a daunting task. However, there is a significant experience extant among librarians, researchers, and publishers regarding the proper organisation of such works, and the ways to improve their usefulness. The inclusion of the many clarifying prefatory remarks and appendices goes a long way to setting the standard for what to include in future such dictionaries, and it is clear that this dictionary has the potential to be useful as a quick reference for basic historical events, people, and concepts. It is painful to note that Scarecrow Press's inadequate editing of this work, and a lack of concision on the part of the authors, is immediately apparent, resulting in readers' frustration as they attempt to find the information they are seeking.

Nowhere in the prefatory material is there a clear indication of the criteria upon which the authors and publisher based their choice to include or exclude topics. One finds, for instance, an article on "BEGGING," which is covered in the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, but nothing on "REINCARNATION," which 'Abdu'l-Bahá had to address in several of his works in answer to questions from western believers. There are articles on "BAB, SHRINE OF" and "BAHA'U'LLAH, SHRINE OF," including references to them as places of pilgrimage; yet there are no separate entries for "BAB, HOUSE OF" or "BAHA'U'LLAH, HOUSE OF," both of which are prescribed places of pilgrimage. Likewise, there is an entry for "INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL," but conspicuously absent are entries for "INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE" and "INTERNATIONAL PARLIAMENT," both of which are part of the international governance prescribed in the Bahá'í writings. There is a relatively short article on E. G. Browne, but no articles on other non-Bahá'í historical figures who were significant in Bahá'í history, such as General Allenby or Manakji Limji Hataria. More serious omissions include: the absence of an article on the Guardianship as an institution, separate from the biography of Shoghi Effendi; lack of articles on Ibrahim G. Kheiralla (the Lebanese Christian convert who established the Bahá'í community in the United States), Paul K. Dealy (prominent early American Bahá'í who assisted Kheiralla) and Refo Çapari (first Albanian Bahá'í); and no entry describing the Bahá'í view of the spiritual role of America in the spread of the religion and the formulation of its administrative structure.

Other volumes in the series, such as the one on Mormonism, included brief but helpful articles based on broad geographical areas - North America, Africa, Asia, Pacific, and so on. The Bahá'í dictionary does not have such a useful overview. For researchers who might find such geographical access useful, the volume would have been helped by an alphabetical geographical index pointing to the biographical articles, since many of these are about early Bahá'ís in specific countries.

A stylistic concern that is immediately recognisable is the use of internal Bahá'í language without any prefatory explanation. The frequent use of "the Faith," "the Cause" and "the believers" gives an internal tone to many of the entries. This is increased by the generally hagiographical content of many of the biographies, parts of which have clearly been taken from the memorial articles in The Bahá'í World or from articles written by devoted family members. For example, in the article on Musa Banani, a stirring testimony to Mr. Banani's faith is recorded: "Towards the end of his life, while he lay paralysed and bedridden, his prayers, like a great beating heart, supported and sustained the teaching work..." This form of biographical praise, even in a sympathetic reference work, impedes the flow of straightforward information that a user of a historical dictionary would expect to find. In the article on the "ARC" on Mount Carmel, mention is made of the astonishment and admiration of Israelis and visitors because the construction on Mount Carmel is paid for solely by the sacrifical participation of Bahá'ís. The style here tends to obscure important information that might have been separated and stated factually elsewhere: that the construction is financed solely by Bahá'í contributions; that contributions for Bahá'í funds are accepted solely from believers.

One obvious disadvantage in using this work is that the dictionary entries are apparently sorted by a computer program that takes into account punctuation and diacriticals. The result is dozens of entries out of order or unfindable except through searching and experience with the book's quirks of location. The entry for "CONVENTION, NATIONAL" appears out of alphabetical order ahead of "CONVENTION, INTERNATIONAL." When I searched for "MUHAMMAD-'ALI," half brother of 'Abdu'l-Bahá, it was not where I expected to find it, but rather immediately after "MUHAMMAD TAQIY-I-ISFAHANI" and just before "MUHAJIR, RAHMATU'LLAH." More problematical is the location of three entries beginning with "GHUSN," which all appear after "GUNG, CLAIRE." This non-alphabetic ordering occurs repeatedly where transliterated words appear, and severely limits the usefulness of the work for the average user. An additional filing problem appears in the bibliography, where titles beginning with "The" are entered alphabetically under T, whereas filings by title should always ignore initial articles.

A further concern has to do with the inconsistent or incorrect use of cross references. Under "ABHA," there is a correct cross reference to "ALLAH'U'ABHA," followed by a reference to "BAHA'U'L-ABHA" rather than to the correct "YA BAHA'U'L-ABHA." Under "ASSISTANTS TO THE AUXILIARY BOARDS [sic] MEMBERS," the cross reference to "AUXILIARY BOARD MEMBERS" should be to "AUXILIARY BOARD," which is the dictionary entry. Occasionally, cross references in an article refer to another cross reference rather than directly to the referenced article, as in "HOUSES OF JUSTICE" where the reader is referred for more information on Shoghi Effendi to the article "GUARDIAN, THE." At "GUARDIAN, THE" one finds "See SHOGHI EFFENDI." The pointer in "HOUSE OF JUSTICE" should simply have referenced the article on Shoghi Effendi with the traditional abbreviation q.v. A parallel problem is inconsistency of name forms in the headings and when those names are referenced in another article. Under "BAKER, EFFIE," one finds that she learned of the Bahá'í Faith from "Father and Mother Dunn." One searches the dictionary in vain for a reference under Dunn. However, if one is already reasonably knowledgeable about Australian Bahá'í history, then one can find the Dunns under "HYDE-DUNN, CLARA" and "HYDE-DUNN, JOHN HENRY." A similar problem involves the tendency to have double entries under different forms of the same name, with one of the forms having a lengthier biography, and often without a cross reference between them. The entries under "AZAL, MIRZA YAHYA" and "MIRZA YAHYA" are one example, compounded by the absence of any cross reference under the title Subh-i-Azal.

The dictionary has, unfortunately, errors of spelling (an editorial lapse) and factual inaccuracies (a lapse in research). The article on "MILLS, MOUNTFORD" [sic] has repeated a common misspelling of Mountfort Mills's first name that could be verified in Stockman's history or in the letters of Shoghi Effendi. The article on "RUMI, SIYYID MUSTAPHAY" [sic] implies a normal death from old age in 1945. However, this Hand of the Cause and a handful of other believers were assassinated, probably in 1945 during the war, according to letters to the Bahá'ís of India published in Messages of Shoghi Effendi to the Indian Subcontinent, 1923-1957 (New Delhi: Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1995). Under "'ABBAS EFFENDI," the definition states that non-Bahá'ís gave him that name, whereas 'Abbás was 'Abdu'l-Bahá's given name, bestowed on him by Bahá'u'lláh. The introduction indicates four languages in which Bahá'í writings were revealed - classical and modern Persian, and classical and modern Arabic - missing the prayers and tablets revealed in Ottoman Turkish by 'Abdu'l-Bahá.

In browsing through the general entries on theological topics, sometimes a non-Bahá'í would be hard put to understand what is being communicated. If we take, for example, the entry under "GOD," there is no succinct explanation that Bahá'u'lláh teaches one God, incomprehensible at the level of His essence, Who reveals His attributes universally in creation, and specifically in a series of divine Messengers or Manifestations. Instead there is a brief discussion of divine attributes, followed by a quotation from Bahá'u'lláh that indicates God's exalted station, and His revelation through Manifestations. To the uninitiated, this is not clear, particularly as the following article is "GOD, ATTRIBUTES OF." The article on "GOD, MANIFESTATION OF" defines briefly that a Manifestation is the founder of a revealed world religion, and includes a lengthy quotation. Yet it does not address such important questions as whether the Manifestation is God incarnate, simply an advanced human being, or somewhere between God and man; it misses Adam and Joseph as additional Manifestations; and it does not consider that Bahá'u'lláh implies the existence of Manifestations not named in the Holy Books. The dictionary is thus inadequate in conveying the full extent of basic concepts, and is missing other topics that should have been included. Indeed, there could well have been an article on creation, the difference between essence and attribute in Bahá'í philosophy, and the terms "Prophet" as opposed to "Messenger" and "Manifestation." These theological and philosophical articles would have benefited from more careful construction, succinct explanations, and a reduction in the number of quotations, as well as some sort of historical context.

One remaining observation that limits the usefulness of the work has to do with the structure of some of the articles. In any encyclopædia or dictionary, the basic definition or salient points for each entry must appear in the first one or two sentences. In the article "UNIVERSAL HOUSE OF JUSTICE," there is no succinct statement up front that it is the highest elected institution in the Bahá'í Faith, a 9-member council elected every five years, charged with legislating on matters not dealt with in the Bahá'í sacred texts. Similarly, in the biography "HAYDEN, ROBERT EARL," one finds only toward the end of the article that he was a "gifted, internationally recognized poet," which is his great claim to fame. There is no mention of his having been for two terms the Poet in Residence at the Library of Congress (now Poet Laureate of the United States).

Preparing reference works is a difficult job. An obsession with detail, organisational structure, and clarity of expression is vital if a reference work is to communicate the essential information sought by readers and researchers. Adamson and Hainsworth have given this difficult task a good effort, which must also have been under a serious time deadline. Scarecrow Press has done them a disservice by not becoming much more attentive to problems of organisation, style, and detail. A review of the manuscript by librarians, Bahá'í historians, and researchers would have caught many of the work's weaknesses ahead of time, and provided to the user a work easier to use and more concise in its information. Given its rather expensive price, the final product deserved better care and treatment.

For the time being, interested readers can continue to use A Basic Bahá'í Dictionary, and can look forward to A Concise Encyclopædia of the Bahá'í Faith by Peter Smith (scheduled for 1999 publication from Oneworld), and ultimately the Short Encyclopædia of the Bahá'í Faith under the auspices of the National Spiritual Assembly of the Bahá'ís of the United States.


NextNextPivot of the Universe: Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar and the Iranian Monarchy, 1831-1896
Author: Abbas Amanat.
Publisher: University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1997, 536 pages
Reviewer: Sholeh A. Quinn

Abbas Amanat's Pivot of the Universe is a biography of the first phase (1848-1871) of Nasir al-Din Shah's reign. Despite the recent tremendous interest in Qajar studies and the publication of numerous specialised monographs and even more scholarly articles over the past decade or so, the field is still in great need of full-length biographies on the Qajar kings. Amanat's study goes a long way in addressing this deficiency. Drawing on a wide range of published and unpublished primary sources, including newspapers, British foreign office records, Persian chronicles and, Qajar documents, Amanat places the reign of Nasir al-Din Shah within the context of the centuries-old tradition of Persian monarchy. Although there exists a significant corpus of literature addressing the institution of Persian kingship, most of that has focused on the pre-modern period of Iranian history. The Qajar period, though, raises some of the most interesting questions about kingship. What happened to this institution with the onset of western influence in Iran? How were its traditional elements modified as a result of modern international and domestic challenges? These are the questions that Amanat sets out to answer in his study.

Writing biography requires a historian to use the full range of available methodological approaches, and in his attempt to understand Nasir al-Din Shah, Amanat writes political, intellectual, social, and psychological history. The introductory chapters of the book cover Nasir al-Din's childhood upbringing and his youth. Here, Amanat focuses on his early relationships with various members of his family, in particular the problematic relationship with his father, and his ties with other individuals attached to the royal household, such as servants. He also describes the circumstances under which Nasir al-Din became heir-apparent, and explores what might have been some likely early intellectual influences on Nasir al-Din's life, such as various works of the "mirrors for princes" or "advice for the prince" genre, and geographical treatises.

In each of the chapters focusing on Nasir al-Din's life as king, the primary themes include (1) the relationship between the king and each of his prime ministers, Amir Nizam and Mirza Aqa Khan Nuri, (2) the two foreign powers who have a strong presence and influence in Iran, the British and the Russians, and (3) the influence of the royal household, in particular the king's mother, Mahd Ulya, and, later, his favourite wife, Jayran. The main question posed throughout is how did the kingship survive through old tensions, as exemplified by the problems between king and minister, and the new challenges posed by the European presence in Iran?

Nasir al-Din Shah had problematic relationships with both of his prime ministers. The first, his "atabak" Amir Kabir, was executed on the king's order in 1852, and the second, Mirza Aqa Khan Nuri, was exiled in 1858. In addition to providing a great deal of information on both of these individuals, which results in some new assessments about their premierships, Amanat explains their often difficult relationships with the king in the context of Nasir al-Din Shah's attempts to rule independently and absolutely as he matured, and also in connection with the British and Russian representatives in Iran in the Nasirean period.

This book certainly drives home the point that both the British and the Russians had a very strong presence in Iran throughout the period in question, and Amanat carefully describes the extent and nature of this European presence. Nasir al-Din Shah navigated these troubled waters by attempting to set one power against the other; he also made overtures to France, partly because of his life-long fascination with Napoleon I, and when there was war in the Persian Gulf with the British, he tried to promote a "royal cult of 'Ali" in an attempt to boost his own legitimacy.

Amanat does not neglect to explain yet another important locus of power during Nasir al-Din Shah's reign: the harem. Mahd Ulya not only had influence on her son, but she also was involved in various sorts of alliances, usually against each of the prime ministers, in a contest of power. In his fascinating account of these intricate and shifting allegiances, it would have been interesting for Amanat to have drawn comparisons with Ottoman royal women - the sultan's mother, favourite wives, and concubines - in light of Leslie P. Peirce's study, The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire.(6)

Whether describing the shah's relationship with his prime ministers, European representatives, or members of the royal household, Amanat does so in terms of four dimensions in Nasir al-Din Shah's kingship: pre-Islamic, Islamic-Shi'i, nomadic, and modern/western. I would have been interested in knowing more about how the nomadic or Turko-Mongol element played itself out in Nasir al-Din's kingship. The fact that Nasir al-Din might have been modelling some aspects of his reign on Nadir Shah, who belonged to the Afshars, one of the Qizilbash tribes originally associated with the Safavids (along with the Qajars and others), suggests that the model of king as "world conqueror" in terms of Turko-Mongol legitimising principles had survived into the period of Nasir al-Din Shah. It is interesting to note while Nadir Shah might have been a model for Nasir al-Din Shah, Nadir Shah in turn modelled his kingship on a still earlier ruler of Iran, Timur (Tamerlane).

Although readers interested in Bábí studies should read Amanat's earlier ground-breaking study, Resurrection and Renewal, which is entirely devoted to the study of the rise of the Bábí movement, Pivot of the Universe also contains information on the Bábís and describes various Bábí events in connection with Nasir al-Din's life. In Pivot of the Universe, Amanat discusses the major episodes that involved Nasir al-Din and the Bábís both before and after he became king. These include his presence at the Báb's public trial in Tabriz in 1848, the 1852 assassination attempt on the king's life by a group of Bábís and the psychological impact this event had on the king, and the subsequent backlash against the Bábí community. In this regard, Amanat outlines the prime minister's involvement in the backlash, describing Aqa Khan Nuri's "collective frenzy of killings" as "spectacular even by Qajar standards" (212) and explaining how the entire Qajar ruling elite became involved in attempting to eradicate the Bábís. According to Amanat, this persecution made the Báb's teachings even more popular. As for Amir Kabir and his role in the political defeat of the Bábís, Amanat states that "an indigenous movement of change ceased to exist for decades to come." By suppressing the Bábís, "Amir Kabir inadvertently cleared the way for the consolidation of the high 'ulama for the rest of the century and beyond" (168).

Pivot of the Universe is essential reading for everyone interested in Bábí and Bahá'í studies, Iranian history, and kingship studies. The transliteration scheme employed throughout this monograph, which eliminates dots, underlines, and macrons, is highly refreshing. Indeed, this style thankfully appears to have become a standard alternative when choosing transliteration systems. Although this study would have benefited from a glossary and timeline for those not familiar with the topic, the map, genealogies, and illustrations are extremely useful additions to this highly readable book, and Amanat is to be commended for taking the reader so carefully and clearly through the complex events he describes. One hopes that this volume will inaugurate an entire series of much-needed biographies on each of the Qajar kings.


|| CONTENTS BY VOLUME || CONTENTS BY TITLE || CONTENTS BY AUTHOR || REVIEWS BY TITLE ||
|| ABS(ESE) HOME PAGE || MEMBERSHIP OF ABS(ESE) ||
Copyright © 1998, Association for Baha'i Studies (English-Speaking Europe)

PreviousTop of Page

End Notes (Use [BACK] to return to article.)
  1. This review was originally published in Mélange de Science Religieuse 54.1 (1997): 116-18.
  2. Les Bahá'ís: Peuple de la Triple Unité (Brepols, 1987) 165.
  3. I would like to take this opportunity to mention Udo Schaefer's most fascinating essays in Bahá'í theology, which have recently been translated into French by Hélène Momtaz and Susanne Hof: L'histoire du Salut et Changement de Paradigme. Deux Contributions à la foi Bahá'íe (Genève: Association d'Études Bahá'íes d'Europe Francophone, 1993, 160pp. [and into English as Beyond the Clash of Religions]). The first essay presents the Bahá'í revelation as the fulfilment of messianic expectation or parousia, which while in some aspects analogous to the hopes of the New Age, clearly sets itself apart by aligning itself with the succession of great revealed religions; the second essay deals with the history of religions, with their diversity, but also with their complementarity and their unity, according to the Bahá'í Faith, within a single plan. It constitutes a theology of religions which goes to the very heart of the Bahá'í Faith.
  4. L. Henuzet, Les Bahá'ís par Christian Cannuyer. Le point de vue d'un Bahá'í. (Brussels: Maison d'Éditions Bahá'íes, 1990, 91pp).
  5. Another significant recent example of Bahá'í "hagiography" is the booklet published on the occasion of the centenary of the prophet's death entitled Bahá'u'lláh (1817-1892) (Paris: Bahá'í International Community Office of Public Information, 1992).
  6. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.